This is part 2 of my debate of which is the role of the sound designer and the sound editor and the sound mixer.
So what i hear now everyone say is that the editor has most of the creative power.
SO BOLLOCKS! NOW I WANT TO BE AN EDITOR?
No i don't thank you very much!
So the poor sound mixer is just a mere puppet on a studio, working for his cancer (a lot of buildings are isolated with a sort of sponge that is cancerigenous (???)) trying to make miracles out of some people's demands ,such as the one i heard a few days ago " my friend is a sound engineer at the BBC and i have seen him working; when he has a crap sound he just presses a button - a buuuut-on - and the sound is all of a sudden much better" anyone, coments to this one???
this is purely ironic :WHAT DOES THE SOUND DESIGNER DO? he "builds the sounds of the rooms, the effects, all that crap that directors and editors and all that lot can't so...
The sound designer is not recognise in this fuckin stupid industry!
HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN THE NAME OF A SOUND DESIGNER IN THE OPENING OF A FILM?
GO ON! SAY IT?
not offten i reckon...
Another subject i would like to make public today is that some people work in an office, should ask people in their office to cover them for lunch, not ask the engineers of the company to do it. sometimes they are with clients and would be lovely if they 'd say " i'm off to cover the office manager! sorry about that, she needs to go for lunch" while NONE OF US EVER TAKES A FUCKING LUNCH BREAK!
one is water the other is oil and they dont go together. I'm sorry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment